An executive dashboard the CEO can question.
Five systems, five people, two weeks late. Now one question, answered the same day.
What changed, months later
- The monthly consolidation exercise disappeared, and nobody has asked for it back.
- A follow-up question costs nothing. Questions that took a week are answered the same day.
- Definitional disputes happen once, upstream, in a document with a date and an owner.
The situation
The data existed. It reached the CEO through five people, in five formats, about two weeks late, and shaped on the way. A utilization figure that arrives with an explanation from the person accountable for it is not the same thing as a utilization figure.
Definitions came before extraction, and they were the hardest part: three sessions on what utilization means, when an engagement counts as booked, and what a client is when three subsidiaries buy separately.
What was built
A consolidated store under a semantic layer
Five systems reconciled into one, with entity resolution so a client is the same client everywhere.
Questions in plain language
No query syntax, no report request, no analyst in the loop. Every answer carries its definition, its source system, and its last refresh time.
One metric published as a gap
A requested metric was dropped outright, in writing. The project record’s exact words are quoted with this study.
Where it stopped
Refusing to approximate one metric bought credibility for all the others. It became the decision the CEO cited most often.
“Pipeline conversion by practice cannot be computed from these sources at a quality anyone should act on. Approximating it would produce a number that looks authoritative and is not.”














